Peer Review Proccess

The Journal of the American Institute is committed to upholding the highest standards of academic integrity and quality. Our peer review process is a central element of our editorial procedure, ensuring that only high-quality research is published in our journal. Below is a detailed explanation of the peer review process.

1. Double-Blind Review

Our journal employs a double-blind peer review process. In this system:

  • Authors do not know the identities of the reviewers.
  • Reviewers do not know the identities of the authors. This process ensures impartiality and helps maintain the objectivity of the review process.

2. Manuscript Evaluation

Once a manuscript is submitted, it undergoes an initial screening by the editorial team to ensure it meets the basic requirements for submission. If the manuscript is deemed suitable, it is sent to at least two independent experts in the subject area of the manuscript for review. Reviewers are selected based on their expertise, research background, and relevance to the manuscript’s content.

3. Criteria for Review

Reviewers assess the manuscript based on several key factors, including but not limited to:

  • Originality: Is the research novel and does it contribute new insights to the field?
  • Methodology: Are the research methods appropriate, sound, and well-executed?
  • Clarity and Structure: Is the manuscript clearly written, well-organized, and easy to follow?
  • Relevance: Does the manuscript address an important question or problem in the field?
  • Literature Review: Does the manuscript provide a comprehensive and balanced review of existing literature?
  • Ethical Considerations: Are ethical guidelines and standards (such as participant consent, data privacy, and conflict of interest disclosures) properly followed?

Reviewers provide constructive feedback that helps authors improve the quality of their work. They also make a recommendation to the editor regarding whether the manuscript should be accepted, revised, or rejected.

4. Reviewer Confidentiality

To ensure fairness and avoid any conflicts of interest, reviewers are expected to maintain strict confidentiality about the manuscript content. They must not share or discuss the manuscript with others unless authorized by the editor. Reviewers are also required to disclose any potential conflicts of interest that may bias their judgment.

5. Review Outcome

After receiving the reviewer reports, the handling editor makes one of the following decisions:

  • Accept: The manuscript is accepted for publication without revisions or with minimal revisions.
  • Minor Revisions: The manuscript requires minor changes, which the authors can easily address before resubmitting.
  • Major Revisions: The manuscript requires significant changes. Authors must revise their manuscript in response to the reviewer feedback and resubmit it for a second round of review.
  • Reject: The manuscript does not meet the journal’s standards or scope and is rejected.

6. Revision Process

If revisions are necessary, authors are given a chance to address the reviewer feedback and resubmit the manuscript. Authors are required to provide a detailed revision letter explaining how they have addressed each reviewer’s comment. This ensures transparency in the revision process. After receiving the revised manuscript, the editor may either approve it for publication or send it back to the reviewers for further evaluation.

7. Timeliness and Fairness

The peer review process is designed to be efficient, transparent, and fair. Reviewers are given a reasonable timeframe to provide their feedback, and we aim to provide authors with decisions and feedback in a timely manner.

8. Open Peer Review (Optional)

In some cases, the journal may implement open peer review, where the reviewer names are disclosed along with the feedback. This practice encourages transparency and accountability in the review process. However, the use of open peer review will be at the discretion of the editor and based on the specific circumstances of the manuscript.

9. Ethical Guidelines

The Journal of the American Institute (Multidisciplinary) adheres to ethical guidelines for the peer review process, including the principles of fairness, transparency, and confidentiality. We expect reviewers to provide honest and constructive feedback and ensure that all research is evaluated based solely on its academic merit.

Contact Information If you have any questions or would like to get involved as a reviewer, please contact the editorial office at:
Email: